Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

WS-1568 Execution status filtering

Merged Daniel Nemergut requested to merge ws1568-execution_status_filtering into main
1 unresolved thread

This adds execution status to the filter options.

I grabbed the list of statuses from the capability_states table. There might be more than needed, but it can be trimmed down later if people would like.

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
50 50 <br />
51 51
52 52 <div>
53 <app-filter-menu *ngIf="showFilterMenu" [state]="statesToFilter" [daStaff]="qaStaff['DA']" [aodStaff]="qaStaff['AOD']" [srdpStatus]="srdpOptions" [filters]="filters" (filterMenuEventEmitter)="emitFilterEvent($event)"></app-filter-menu>
53 <app-filter-menu *ngIf="showFilterMenu" [state]="statesToFilter" [exec_status]="execStatusToFilter" [daStaff]="qaStaff['DA']" [aodStaff]="qaStaff['AOD']" [srdpStatus]="srdpOptions" [filters]="filters" (filterMenuEventEmitter)="emitFilterEvent($event)"></app-filter-menu>
  • Charlotte Hausman approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Brittany Faciane approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Nathan Bockisch approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Daniel Nemergut added 7 commits

    added 7 commits

    • 866ba375...02d724b6 - 4 commits from branch main
    • c5070ba4 - Initial filter button, the logic needs to use the execution status name added by the sorting task
    • 0203b3f0 - Logic for execution status filtering
    • 42f0fc69 - Added remaining execution states for the filter, might be more than needed

    Compare with previous version

  • Daniel Nemergut enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 42f0fc69 succeeds

    enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 42f0fc69 succeeds

  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading