Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

WS-1814 and WS-1815: Add email QA Pass button and remove email from QA Fail

3 unresolved threads

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
1 {{#version}}{{#parameters}}{{#metadata}}{{#is_srdp}}Subject: Calibration complete for {{sdm_id}}
2 {{#custom_text}}{{custom_text}}{{/custom_text}}{{^custom_text}}The results of this data processing request passed our quality assurance, with the following notes:{{/custom_text}}
  • This should do the trick!

  • Yeah, I thought it would be better to repurpose the std_calibration_complete template than create a new one, especially since the fail entire request button (and previously qa fail buttons) use the std_calibration_fail template. That said if people think we should use a new template instead I can do that too.

  • It's a good thought. I would stick with this template and get feedback at the review. Someone is bound to have an opinion no matter what you do.

  • Please register or sign in to reply
  • Daniel Nemergut approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Brittany Faciane approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Daniel Lyons
  • 40
    41 Find the specific observation you want and if you would like to recreate the pipeline calibration, click the icon in the "Cals" column near the right side of the returned list, which should bring up a pop-up window to download a tar file named something like project-code_YYYY_MM_DD_THH_MM_SS.SSS.tar, and click "Submit Request". Once ready, you should receive an email with download instructions.
    42
    43 ____________
    44
    45 For more information about the pipeline, including instructions for rerunning the pipeline, applying pipeline calibration to raw data, or modification to suit your particular science goals, or access to the scripted pipeline please visit our pipeline web page: https://science.nrao.edu/facilities/vla/data-processing/pipeline
    46
    47 For more information about the SRDP project, please see https://science.nrao.edu/srdp
    48
    49 Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns through the NRAO Helpdesk (https://help.nrao.edu/) , using the VLA Pipeline department for questions about the pipeline processing, the VLA/VLBA Archive and Data Retrieval department for questions about data retrieval, and the VLA Data Products department for questions about quality assurance and the use of of Science-Ready (SRDP) products.{{/is_srdp}}{{^is_srdp}}Subject: Calibration complete for {{sdm_id}}
    50
    51 Hello,
    52
    53 One of your Scheduling Blocks has been processed through the VLA CASA Calibration Pipeline using CASA 6.2.1, which is designed to handle Stokes I continuum data, and is now available should you wish to access the calibrated data.
    54
    55 {{sdm_id}}, observed on {{obs_end_time}}, {{bands}}, <filesize>
  • Daniel Lyons
  • 1 {{#version}}{{#parameters}}{{#metadata}}{{#is_srdp}}Subject: Calibration complete for {{sdm_id}}
    2
    3 Hello,
    4
    5 One of your Scheduling Blocks,
    6
    7 {{sdm_id}}, observed on {{obs_end_time}}, {{bands}}, <filesize>
    8
    9 has been processed through the VLA CASA Calibration Pipeline using CASA 6.2.1, which is designed to handle Stokes I continuum data, and is now available should you wish to access the calibrated data.
    10
    11 These results have been checked by NRAO staff and notes about the quality assurance are below (these notes are also in the weblog).
    12
    13 {{#workflow_metadata}}{{#qa}}{{qa}}{{/qa}}{{^qa}}No QA notes available.{{/qa}}{{/workflow_metadata}}{{^workflow_metadata}}No QA notes available.{{/workflow_metadata}}
  • Daniel Lyons approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • Nathan Bockisch mentioned in commit e298bdf1

    mentioned in commit e298bdf1

  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading